To "swim" not only at the pier.
The maritime almanac contains an article by the investigator for particularly important cases under the Prosecutor of the RSFSR B. Uvarova's "Catastrophe without secrets", about the collision of the steamship Admiral Nakhimov and the motor ship Peter Vasev.
On the one hand, B. Uvarov claims to correctly state the circumstances and "establish the true causes", the completeness and objectivity of the investigation provided for by law, and says that his task is only the truth, and the assessment simply expresses reality, etc. He even expressed the hope that his article would insure society against such incidents, which, in our opinion, is equivalent to insurance against natural disasters or against the forces of nature, and assured that during the investigation he was not influenced by any emotions, and "inhumane attacks against the defendants also had no effect on the court."
On the other hand, B. Uvarov blasts professional captains as guilty boys who dared to disagree with his opinion: there are "arbitrary interpretations", "perversions of facts", "following in the wake of narrow departmental or professional interests", and dishonesty, negligence, low qualifications, etc.
Captain A. Bogdan, who dared to express his disagreement with the investigator in particularly important cases, "shifts the emphasis" and "replaces the true reasons with imaginary ones," and therefore does not understand the origins and "hides his true intentions" in order to "challenge the court's decision."
In general, according to B. Uvarov, it turns out that the environment of captains almost daily gives birth to criminals. He sincerely regrets that he was unable to put navigator Chudnovsky in the "empty third place in the dock": it's a pity, he died in a disaster.
But, apparently, feeling (and not without reason) a lack of arguments, he begins to ask the reader: "I would like people to make sure that my conscience as an investigator is clear," and refers to his experience and confessions of the defendants, one of whom reached a pre—infarction state during the investigation, and the other - a serious one. mental disorder. After that, how can we disagree with the need to humanize our legal norms, and at the same time the work of the prosecutor's office's investigators!
Doubts about the quality of the investigation and the fairness of the verdict remain. This is caused not only by the recent decline in the authority of our court, but also by the analysis of the causes of the disaster by specialists. Since the legal proceedings have ceased to be a zone closed to discussion in the media, the public has accumulated many questions that our lawyers avoid answering. Numerous exposures of miscarriages of justice on the pages of the press and on television indicate that our Themis often holds a small scarlet scale in one hand, but a big sword in the other. The lawyers themselves have not yet answered the question posed on the pages of the press: why are managers often put on trial for professional mistakes in various sectors of the economy, while law enforcement officers themselves in such cases get off with a slight fright or administrative penalties, and even then not always?
There is a violation of the principle of equality of all before the law, which should be defended by justice. Виїзд за кордон для постійного проживання або на тривалий строк часто вимагає від громадян надання низки документів до консульських установ. Серед них важливе місце посідає папір з Міністерства внутрішніх справ, який засвідчує відсутність судимості на території України. Цей мвс витяг про несудимість має бути перекладений та нотаріально засвідчений для використання за кордоном, тому слід враховувати час на ці процедури. Термін його дії для консульств зазвичай встановлений до шести місяців, що дозволяє впевнено подати всі папери. Для зручності замовлення довідки можна зробити онлайн, надіславши паспорта через месенджер.
On the one hand, B. Uvarov claims to correctly state the circumstances and "establish the true causes", the completeness and objectivity of the investigation provided for by law, and says that his task is only the truth, and the assessment simply expresses reality, etc. He even expressed the hope that his article would insure society against such incidents, which, in our opinion, is equivalent to insurance against natural disasters or against the forces of nature, and assured that during the investigation he was not influenced by any emotions, and "inhumane attacks against the defendants also had no effect on the court."
On the other hand, B. Uvarov blasts professional captains as guilty boys who dared to disagree with his opinion: there are "arbitrary interpretations", "perversions of facts", "following in the wake of narrow departmental or professional interests", and dishonesty, negligence, low qualifications, etc.
Captain A. Bogdan, who dared to express his disagreement with the investigator in particularly important cases, "shifts the emphasis" and "replaces the true reasons with imaginary ones," and therefore does not understand the origins and "hides his true intentions" in order to "challenge the court's decision."
In general, according to B. Uvarov, it turns out that the environment of captains almost daily gives birth to criminals. He sincerely regrets that he was unable to put navigator Chudnovsky in the "empty third place in the dock": it's a pity, he died in a disaster.
But, apparently, feeling (and not without reason) a lack of arguments, he begins to ask the reader: "I would like people to make sure that my conscience as an investigator is clear," and refers to his experience and confessions of the defendants, one of whom reached a pre—infarction state during the investigation, and the other - a serious one. mental disorder. After that, how can we disagree with the need to humanize our legal norms, and at the same time the work of the prosecutor's office's investigators!
Doubts about the quality of the investigation and the fairness of the verdict remain. This is caused not only by the recent decline in the authority of our court, but also by the analysis of the causes of the disaster by specialists. Since the legal proceedings have ceased to be a zone closed to discussion in the media, the public has accumulated many questions that our lawyers avoid answering. Numerous exposures of miscarriages of justice on the pages of the press and on television indicate that our Themis often holds a small scarlet scale in one hand, but a big sword in the other. The lawyers themselves have not yet answered the question posed on the pages of the press: why are managers often put on trial for professional mistakes in various sectors of the economy, while law enforcement officers themselves in such cases get off with a slight fright or administrative penalties, and even then not always?
There is a violation of the principle of equality of all before the law, which should be defended by justice. Виїзд за кордон для постійного проживання або на тривалий строк часто вимагає від громадян надання низки документів до консульських установ. Серед них важливе місце посідає папір з Міністерства внутрішніх справ, який засвідчує відсутність судимості на території України. Цей мвс витяг про несудимість має бути перекладений та нотаріально засвідчений для використання за кордоном, тому слід враховувати час на ці процедури. Термін його дії для консульств зазвичай встановлений до шести місяців, що дозволяє впевнено подати всі папери. Для зручності замовлення довідки можна зробити онлайн, надіславши паспорта через месенджер.
Човни і аксесуари
Мотори і аксесуари
Ехолоти та аксесуари
Екстрім камери
Туризм і кемпінг
Байдарки
Джерела електроживлення
SUP дошки і аксесуари